This appeal was disposed of in identical terms to a previous judgment (ITA No.897 of 2008) passed on the same day by the same court, without independent reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
ITA No.966 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.10.2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula
-----Appellant
Vs.
Smt.Rani Kamla Devi
----Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH
Present:Mr. Yogesh Putney, Sr.Standing Counsel for the revenueAppellant.
Ms. Radhika Suri, Advocate for the assessee.
Adarsh Kumar Goel ,J.
In view of order passed today in ITA No.897 of
2008 ( The Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula v.
Smt.Prabha Singh ), this appeal is disposed of in same
terms.
(Adarsh Kumar Goel) Judge
October 22, 2009 (Gurdev Singh) ‘gs’ Judge
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
ITA No.897 of 2008 (The Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula v. Smt.Prabha Singh)Referred¶12
Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula
Smt. Rani Kamla Devi
Adarsh Kumar Goel
Gurdev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
