This is an announce order. The two Judges of the Punjab and Haryana High Court expressed views on whether the short order should be published in reporters or the Digest. No substantive legal grounds or relief were discussed.
None. Order references GSTRs 18 & 19 of 2005 for details.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
G.S.T.R. No. 39 of 2005
Date of Decision: February 3, 2009
M/s Nirajan Singh Didar Singh, Tohana
…Applicant
Versus
State of Haryana
…Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA
Present: None for the applicant.
Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Addl. AG, Haryana for the respondent.
M.M. KUMAR, J.
For orders see G.S.T.R. Nos. 18 & 19 of 2005.
(M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE
February 3, 2009
(H.S. BHALLA) JUDGE
Pkapoor
M/s Nirajan Singh Didar Singh
State of Haryana
M.M. KUMAR
H.S. BHALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
