The court dismissed the appeal after learning that the parties had settled their claims, allowing liberty for revival if settlement is later found to be false.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh
FAO No. 889 of 1983 (O&M)
Darbara Singh and others ..... Appellants vs Shmt. Dalip Kaur and another ..... Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present: Mr. Harvinder Singh, Advocate, for the appellants.
Rajesh Bindal J.
Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that as per information received by him from the counsel in the court below, the parties have settled their respective claims and in view of that claim made in the present appeal does not survive. He further submitted that as the appellants could not be contacted, he may be given liberty to get the present appeal revived in case the information furnished by the counsel in the court below is found to be not true later on.
Dismissed with aforesaid liberty.
8.12.2009 vs
( Rajesh Bindal) Judge
Darbara Singh and others
Shmt. Dalip Kaur and another
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
