An appeal questioning custody of a minor was dismissed as infructuous because the minor had already attained the age of majority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No. 3930 of 2004 Date of decision: August 06, 2009
Ms. Harjit Kaur
........ Appellant
Versus
Dr. Parminder Charan Singh and another .......Respondent(s)
Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
-.-
Present: Mr. I K Mehta, Senior Advocate with Ms Ranjit Mehta, Advocate for the appellant
Mr. Harpreet Singh, Advocate for Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Sr. Advocate for the respondents
-.-
Nirmaljit Kaur, J.
Mr. Mehta, Senior counsel appearing for the appellant states that the
present appeal has become infructuous as it pertains to the custody of the minor. The minor have since attained the age of majority, i.e. 18 years.
In view of the statement made above, the present appeal is ordered to be dismissed as infructuous.
(Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge
August 06, 2009 mohan
Ms. Harjit Kaur
Dr. Parminder Charan Singh and another
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
