The single judge allowed the appeal as withdrawn on the ground that the parties had come to terms. The disposition was disposed of accordingly on April 24, 2009.
Appeal allowed as withdrawn; matter disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.M. No. 9186-CII of 2009 in/and F.A.O. No. M-154 of 2007 (O&M)
Date of Decision: April 24, 2009
Suman
…Appellant
Versus
Sri Bhagwan and another.
… Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND.
Present : Mr. Dharmesh Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ramesh Hooda, Advocate, for the respondent.
S.D. Anand, J. (Oral)
The learned counsel for the appellant states that since
the parties have come to terms, the instant appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Disposed of accordingly.
April 24, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge
Suman
Sri Bhagwan and another
S.D. Anand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
