Petitioner sought to amend and withdraw a civil writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. The court granted the withdrawal with liberty to refile.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition. No.9857 of 2008(O&M) Decided on : 07-07-2009
Renu Aggarwal
.... Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana, Chandigarh & others.
.... Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL .
Present:Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Kirti Singh, A.A.G., Haryana, for respondent No.1.
Mr. BL Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Mr. Amand Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 4 & 5.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J (Oral).
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner wants to amend this petition, so he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh one with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
7th July, 2009. (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) Monika JUDGE
Renu Aggarwal
State of Haryana
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
