The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking appointment as Excise Inspector after 16 years, noting the cause of action may have perished due to the efflux of time.
liberty to file application if cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No. 4372 of 1993 DATE OF DECISION: November 18, 2009
Charanjit Singh
.........PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Punjab and Another
......RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
Present: None for the petitioner.
Ms. Charu Tuli, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
AJAI LAMBA, J. (ORAL)
This civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider and appoint the petitioner as Excise Inspector.
The matter relates to the year 1993 i.e. 16 years back. In view iof the efflux of time, the matter is disposed of.
In case, cause of action survives, the petitioner would be at liberty to file an application.
18.11.2009 (AJAI LAMBA) shivani JUDGE
Charanjit Singh
State of Punjab
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
