The petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition concerning undertrials, reserving liberty to approach trial courts for directions. The court granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed with liberty reserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 3040 of 2009 Date of Decision: 26.02.2009
Universal Human Rights Organisation
..Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.THAKUR,CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
Present : Mr. B.P.Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioner
T.S.Thakur, C.J. (Oral)
After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition reserving liberty for the undertrials to approach the competent trial Courts for appropriate directions on the subject.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for.
(T.S.THAKUR) CHIEF JUSTICE
26.02.2009 'ravinder'
(HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE
Universal Human Rights Organisation
State of Punjab
T.S. Thakur
Hemant Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
