This single-paragraph oral order records the dismissal of a withdrawn writ petition on the petitioner's submission regarding termination of services.
Petitioner's petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the termination order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No. 19050 of 2008 Decided on : 26-05-2009
Chander Kanta Bhola
....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana, Chandigarh and others
....Respondents
CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL .
Present:Mrs. Renu Bala Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mrs. Sushma Chopra, Addl. A.G., Haryana, for respondent Nos.1 & 2. None for respondent Nos.3 & 4.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J (Oral).
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that during the pendency of the petition, the services of the petitioner have been dispensed with/terminated, therefore, she wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to challenge the said order in accordance with law.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
26th May, 2009. (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) Monika JUDGE
Chander Kanta Bhola
State of Haryana
Satish Kumar Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
