In this order, the petitioner was permitted to withdraw the writ petition concerning alleged abiana for river Ghaggar water usage. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn on the State counsel's submission.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Civil Writ Petition No. 1461 of 1989 Date of Decision:November 12, 2009
Kanwar Singh and others
---Petitioners
versus
State of Punjab and others
---Respondents
Coram: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH
Present: Mr. Nirmal Singh, Advocate, for Mr. Nasib Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioners
Mr.Amit Chaudhary, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab for the respondents.
GURDEV SINGH, J. (Oral)
Learned State counsel has submitted that, at present, no such alleged abiana is being charged for the use of water being pumped out of river Ghaggar.
In view of the above statement, learned counsel appearing for counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE
November 12, 2009
PARAMJIT
Kanwar Singh and others
State of Punjab and others
Gurdev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
