The High Court of Punjab and Haryana held a writ petition infructuous after the respondent's counsel stated that the refund amount claimed by the petitioner had been disbursed.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.11899 of 2008 Date of Decision: December 10, 2009
Dr. Shivali
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Punjab & Others
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: - Mr. Rajinder Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
. . .
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Prishad, Amritsar, is present in Court and states that refund of Rs.90,000/- has been given to the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that indeed the money has been received and therefore, cause of action does not survive.
Disposed of as infructuous.
(AJAI LAMBA)
CWP No. of 2009 [2]
December 10, 2009 JUDGE avin
Dr. Shivali
State of Punjab
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
