The petitioner requested liberty to withdraw the writ petition to pursue a competent revision petition. The court granted liberty and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Liberty granted to withdraw the writ petition to avail of revision remedy; dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 11486 OF 2009
DATE OF DECISION: August 03, 2009.
Parties Name
Satish Kumar
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Haryana and others
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
PRESENT: Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for the petitioner.
JASBIR SINGH, J. (oral)
Order.
When confronted with a fact that against the order under challenge, a revision petition is competent, counsel for the petitioner states that he be allowed to withdraw this writ petition to avail that remedy.
Liberty granted.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
August 03, 2009 ( Jasbir Singh ) DKC Judge
Satish Kumar
The State of Haryana
Jasbir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
