Sushil Kumar v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought withdrawal of the criminal miscellaneous petition. The High Court allowed the withdrawal upon prayer made by counsel.
Petitioner sought withdrawal of the criminal miscellaneous petition. The High Court allowed the withdrawal upon prayer made by counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.Misc. No.M-802 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: 13.01.2009
Sushil Kumar
...PETITIONER
VS.
State of Haryana
...RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL
PRESENT: Mr.N.D.Achint, Advocate for the petitioner.
MOHINDER PAL, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be
allowed to withdraw the present petition at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn as prayed for.
January 13, 2009 jt
( MOHINDER PAL ) JUDGE
Sushil Kumar
State of Haryana
MOHINDER PAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court