Petitioner sought directions for arrest of accused. High Court directed respondents to look into the grievance and redress it expeditiously as per law without disposing the matter on merits.
Directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to look into the matter and redress the grievance expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.Misc. No.M-34414 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION: 06.01.2009
Anoop Kumar
...PETITIONER
VS.
State of Haryana and another
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL
PRESENT: Mr.Manoj Dhankhar, Advocate for the petitioner.
MOHINDER PAL, J.(Oral)
Through the present petition, the petitioner seeks directions to respondents No.1 to 5 to take action against the accused persons as the FIR in this case has been registered on 01.05.2008 and so far no arrest has been made.
The present petition stands disposed of with directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to look into the matter and redress the grievance of the petitioner expeditiously as per law.
January 06, 2009 ( MOHINDER PAL ) jt JUDGE
Anoop Kumar
State of Haryana
MOHINDER PAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
