Dismissed
Sushil v. State of Haryana
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/31528/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. 31528-M of 2008 Date of Decision: 21.7.2009
Sushil & Ors.
.. Petitioners
Vs.
State of Haryana.
.. Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR,
Present:Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate for the petitioners.
**Mr. S.S. Mor, Sr. DAG Haryana. *****
ARVIND KUMAR, J.
The present petitioners are the accused in case FIR No. 347 dated 12.10.2008, under Sections 323, 452, 325, 506 read with Section 34 IPC, Police Station Samlkha. They filed an application before the trial court for re-medical examination of injured Rinku for obtaining the opinion as to the nature of the injury from the Board of Doctors. Their application has been dismissed on 25.11.2008. Hence this petition.
This Court on 1.12.2008 while issuing notice of motion, also directed that the injured Rinku would be examined by the Board of Doctors to be constituted by the Civil Surgeon, Panipat. In pursuance of the said order, Rinku was examined by the Board and submitted the report.
In view of the said report, learned counsel for the petitioner, in all fairness, contends that the present petition has rendered infructuous and the same be dismissed as such.
It is ordered accordingly. However, if the State or the complainant has any objection to the report of Doctor, they can rake up the same before the appropriate forum and stage, as per law.
(ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE
July 21,2009 Jiten
Sushil & Ors.
State of Haryana
ARVIND KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court