This order is a barren disposal where the bail petition is dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner had already been granted bail by the trial court.
The bail petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-25686 of 2009
Date of decision : November 17, 2009
Rajinder alias Kali
....Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana
....Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal
Present : Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner
Mr. Sidharth Sarup, AAG Haryana
L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Mohinder Singh, states that the petitioner has since been granted bail by the trial court and therefore, the instant bail petition has been rendered infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid, the instant bail petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
November 17, 2009 ' dalbir'
( L.N. Mittal ) Judge
Rajinder alias Kali
State of Haryana
L.N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
