Rakesh Kumar @ Toni Vs State of Punjab

On 13.08.2009, learned counsel for the State, on instructions received from HC Sewa Ram, stated that the petitioner is residing in the same house where Sapna Rani (since deceased) had died. However, the matter was adjourned on the request of counsel for the petitioner in order to verify this fact.

¶20

Today, learned counsel for the State/respondent has made a statement, on instructions received from HC Charanjit Singh, who has verified, that the petitioner is residing in a altogether separate house.

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the order dated 26.6.2009, petitioner has joined the investigation. He further submits that there is no suicide note left by the deceased.

¶22

CRM-M- 16954 of 2009

¶23

- 2 -

¶24

Learned counsel for the State/respondent, on instructions received from HC Charanjit Singh, admits the facts as stated by the counsel for the petitioner.

¶25

In view of the above, order dated 26.06.2009 is hereby

¶26

made absolute.

¶27

It is directed that the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when required and shall abide by the conditions as envisaged by Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶28

Petition is disposed of.

¶29

SEPTEMBER 04, 2009 vivek

¶30

(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JUDGE

Rakesh Kumar @ Toni v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Kumar @ Toni v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravinder Sood Vs State of Punjab

Ashok Kumar Vs State of Punjab & Anr.

Maninder Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Amrik Singh and Anr. Vs Sukhwant Singh and Anr.

Ravinder Kumar Gosain Vs State of Punjab

Gurmail Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.