Neelam v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner surrendered after moving for regular bail. Court dismissed petition as infructuous.
Petitioner surrendered after moving for regular bail. Court dismissed petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.Misc. No.M-1493 of 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 19.01.2009
Neelam
...PETITIONER
VS.
State of Haryana
...RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL
PRESENT: Mr.V.K.Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner.
MOHINDER PAL, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has surrendered before the trial Court and moved for regular bail.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as having been
rendered infructuous.
January 19, 2009 jt
( MOHINDER PAL ) JUDGE
Neelam
State of Haryana
Mohinder Pal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court