The petitioner's criminal miscellaneous petition was not pressed at the stage of hearing, as the case was fixed for charge framing. The court dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No. M-13655 of 2009
Date of Decision : August 20, 2009
Rahul son of Prem
.... Petitioner
Vs.
State of Punjab
.... Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Present : Mr. A.S.Bhatti, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Amandeep Singh Rai, AAG, Punjab.
AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition at this stage as according to the counsel for the State, the case is fixed for 29.08.2009 for framing of charge before the trial Court.
Dismissed as not pressed at this stage.
August 20, 2009 (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) pj JUDGE
Rahul son of Prem
State of Punjab
Augustine George Masih
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
