Quashed
Harbans Kaur and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Anr.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/11347/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc No. M-11347 of 2009 Date of decision : 14.05.2009
Harbans Kaur and another
....Petitioners
V/s
State of Punjab and another
....Respondents
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. H.S. Batth, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG Punjab.
Mr. PKS Phoolka, Advocate for respondent No. 2.
RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pursuant to order dated 27.04.2009, passed by this Court, petitioners have appeared before the trial court and furnished the bail bonds. Learned counsel for respondent No. 2 does not dispute this fact.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners order dated 27.04.2009, passed by this Court is made absolute, subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
14.05.2009 Ajay
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order of anticipatory bail should be made absolute.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Harbans Kaur
another
State of Punjab
another
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court