The court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition as withdrawn by counsel, who was granted liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. 11338 of 2009 Date of decision: November 13, 2009
Sandeep Kumar @ Sonu -Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab -Respondent
Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta
Present: Mr. Nandan Jindal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Rajan Gupta, J.(Oral)
Counsel submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the
instant petition with liberty to file fresh one with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid.
[Rajan Gupta] Judge November 13, 2009. 'ask'
Sandeep Kumar @ Sonu
State of Punjab
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
