Single judge dismissed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. petition for quashing an FIR dated 1999, described as devoid of merit, noting that the case report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. would be submitted shortly.
Petition dismissed as devoid of merit; no further directions issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-10268 of 2008
Date of decision: 6th January, 2009
Amrit Pal
… Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
… Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA
Present: Ms. Gurmeet Gill, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Mehardeep Singh, Assistant Advocate General Punjab for the State.
KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL)
This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 124 dated 19.09.1999 under Section 15 of IMC Act, and Section 26 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act at Police Station Banga.
Petitioner was declared a proclaimed offender. Case pertains to year 1999. Later, he was granted anticipatory bail by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Nawanshahar.
Mr. Mehardeep Singh, Assistant Advocate General Punjab, on instructions from Hukam Singh, ASI, states that in the present case report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. shall be submitted within a fortnight.
Therefore, no further directions are called for. Present petition is disposed off, being devoid of any merit.
[KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE
January 6, 2009 rps
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of the FIR has merit.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Amrit Pal
State of Punjab
Kanwalsingh Ahluwalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
