already been deposited. The respondents have also argued before the lower Court that fee of the petitioner was inadvertently collected by the Accounts Branch and that on coming to know about this, a letter has been issued to the plaintiff for refund of the fee or get the same adjusted in the next session. There does not appear to be any illegality in the order passed by the trial Court as no interim relief can be granted beyond the original relief claimed in the plaint. The suit of the plaintiff is only limited to the extent that she may be permitted to take the examination of 2nd Semester. Since under the directions of the trial Court, she has been permitted to attend the classes of 3rd Semester and the final suit has not been decided, the plaintiffpetitioner can be permitted to take the examination of 3rd Semester at her own risk and responsibility without conferring any legal right upon her in case her suit is dismissed by the Court below. Since technically, the interim relief sought for by the plaintiff-petitioner cannot be granted to her but in view of certain subsequent events i.e., permission having been granted to her to attend the classes she having already deposited the fee, declining a young female student, an opportunity to appear ini the examination will certainly result in injustice. In the larger interest of justice, she is permitted to take the examination of 3rd Semester B-Tech Course of Information Technology (2008-2012), at her own risk and responsibility subject to her other eligibility in accordance with rules of the Institution and the University. She will be entitled to the declaration of result only if her suit regarding 2nd Semester is decreed.
