Sushma v. Thakur Dass
Case brief
What is this about?
In this revision, petitioner-tenant challenged the appellate authority's conditional stay in an eviction appeal, objecting to a high rent rate. The high court found no jurisdictional error in directing rent deposition to maintain the stay and granted extension until the appeal is decided on merits.
What did the court decide?
Extension granted for depositing arrears of rent by 31st October, 2009 to maintain the ad interim stay until the appeal is decided on merits.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
Civil Revision No.6074 of 2009
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No.6074 of 2009 Date of Decision: 22.10.2009
Smt. Sushma . . . . Petitioner
VS.
Shri Thakur Dass . . . . Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT
****
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the revision against the appellate authority's conditional stay is grounded on any jurisdictional error.
Whether to extend time for depositing arrears of rent to maintain the interim stay.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Smt. Sushma
- respondent
Shri Thakur Dass
Coram
Surya Kant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CR/6074/2009
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court