Disposed

Gurdial Singh v. Joginder Singh @ Budhu & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC15 Jul 2009CR/5639/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This revision petition under Article 227 allowed the petitioner an opportunity to conclude his evidence at his own risk, subject to depositing costs with the Legal Services Authority, dismissing the petition otherwise.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted one opportunity to conclude evidence on fixed date subject to depositing Rs.5000 as costs; otherwise revision to be deemed dismissed.

Gurdial Singh Vs Joginder Singh @… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Punjab & Haryana HC (2009)

¶1

Civil Revision No.5639 of 2008

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

Civil Revision No.5639 of 2008

¶5

Date of Decision:15.07.2009

¶6

Gurdial Singh son of Amro Ram

¶7

.....Petitioner

¶8

versus

¶9

Joginder Singh @ Budhu and others

¶10

.....Respondents

¶11

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.

¶12

Present: Mr.Vijay Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner-plaintiff.

¶13

None for the respondents.

¶14

¶15

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.(Oral)

¶16

In this revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-plaintiff has prayed for setting aside the order dated 01.09.2008 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jalandhar, whereby his evidence has been closed by the order of the Court.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in the interest of justice, one opportunity may be granted to the petitioner to lead the entire evidence at his own risk and responsibility and the petitioner can be made liable to pay the costs. He further submits that the petitioner will conclude his entire evidence on the date to be fixed by the trial Court.

¶18

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and in the facts and circumstances of the present case, this Court is satisfied that in the interest of justice, the petitioner deserves to be granted one opportunity

¶19

¶20

Civil Revision No.5639 of 2008

¶21

to conclude his evidence. Accordingly, this revision petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall be granted one opportunity to conclude his entire evidence on the date to be fixed by the trial Court at his own risk and responsibility and subject to payment of Rs.5000/- as costs to be deposited with the Punjab State Legal Services Authority, Chandigarh. It is, however, made clear that in case the petitioner fails to conclude his entire evidence or to produce receipt regarding deposit of the amount of costs, as stipulated above, on the date so fixed by the trial Court, for evidence of the petitioner, this revision petition shall be deemed to have

¶22

been dismissed.

¶23

July 15, 2009 seema

¶24

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE

Gurdial Singh v. Joginder Singh @ Budhu & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gurdial Singh v. Joginder Singh @ Budhu & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Saroop Vs Maya Devi and Ors.

Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs Tarun Jain

United Indian Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Ms. Shenaz and Ors.

Baldev Krishan Vs Bank of India and Ors.

Mohit Kumar Vs Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. and Ors.

UOI & Ors. Vs M/S Kapoor Medical Store