Insofar as the Single Bench ruling in Kawaljit Kaur's case (supra) is concerned, it is inapplicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case. In that case, the Court noticed that the injunction order had been granted in favour of the plaintiffs therein on 21.11.2005 and they moved an application for police help for providing police help for sowing and harvesting the cop on 3.12.2005. That application had otherwise been typed out on 26.11.2005. The plaintiffs also filed subsequent applications dated 5.12.2005, 8.4.2006, 12.4.2006, 18.5.2006, 7.6.2006, 15.6.2006 and 29.9.2006 of similar character. It further noticed that the prayer in all these application was “for directing the police authorities to provide police help either for sowing of the crop or for harvesting the same”. Apart therefrom, this Court also noticed that inspite of the Civil Court orders holding the plaintiffs therein to be in possession in certain Khasra Nos., the facts available on record indicated that “the crop is being harvested by the defendants since November, 2005 which is apparent from the fact that applications are being filed by the plaintiffs for permission to sow the crop under police protection and again harvest the same under police protection.”That case was, thus, based upon peculiar circumstances which have no significant with the present case.
