Dismissed
Suresh Kumar Gupta v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCR/4716/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
C.R. 4716 of 2009 Date of decision:- 12.11.2009
Suresh Kumar Gupta
petitioner
vs
State of Haryana and others
Respondent
Present: Mr. PK Mutneja, Advocate Mr. Kulvir Narwal, Addl. A.G.Hry.
M.M.S.BEDI,J.
Learned State counsel, on the instructions of the official of PGIMS, Rohtak, has informed that the petitioner will not been dispossessed from the shop in dispute except by due process of law.
In view of the said statement, this petition is allowed, orders passed by the courts below are set aside in view of the admitted possession of the plaintiff- petitioner in the shop in dispute. The application for interim injunction is allowed to the effect that the petitioner will not be dispossessed from the shop in dispute except by adopting the due procedure of law. It is not out of place to mention here that proceedings, seeking the eviction of the petitioner, have already been commended by the respondents, regarding which the petitioner has already “a notice”.
November 12 ,2009 (M.M.S.BEDI) TSM JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted relief against dispossession without due legal process.
Suresh Kumar Gupta
State of Haryana
M.M. S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court