Civil Revision petition No. 3455 of 2009 was declared infructuous and subsequently disposed of without substantive adjudication by the single judge.
None; petition declared infructuous and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Civil Revision No. 3455 of 2009
Anjana Mittal
vs. Dinesh Kumar and others
Present: Mr. Amit Kumar Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
It is stated that the present revision petition has been
rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such.
Ordered accordingly.
(AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE
July 06, 2009 sunita
Anjana Mittal
Dinesh Kumar
AJAY TEWARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
