This single-paragraph order vacates a previously granted stay due to the petitioner's failure to comply with a dated order. The court found no fault with the impugned order and dismissed the civil revision.
Vacated the stay granted by this Court vide order dated 13.5.2009 and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Civil Revision No. 2763 of 2008
Date of decision: March 25, 2009
Ajay Kaul
.. Petitioner
Vs.
Satpal and others
.. Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal
Present: Mr. B.D. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
A.N. Jindal, J
Learned counsel for the petitioner has not complied with the order dated 13.5.2009, therefore, stay granted by this Court vide order dated 13.5.2009 stands vacated.
Having examined the impugned order, no fault could be found with the same. It is well reasoned and well founded. Consequently, no interference is called for.
Dismissed.
March 25, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge
Ajay Kaul
Satpal and others
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
