Jaspal Singh v. Yashpal
Case brief
What is this about?
Coram in CH, the High Court upheld eviction orders in a revision petition filed by a landlord under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, dismissing contentions regarding insufficiency of pleadings and lack of evidence regarding allotment to a son.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the landlord's petition for eviction satisfied the statutory requirements regarding personal necessity and availiability of other property.
Whether the disclosure that another son occupied a property in his possession as part of a family partition was sufficient to sustain the personal necessity plea.
Whether the omission to examine the son on whose personal necessity the eviction plea was based vitiates the eviction order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jaspai Singh
- respondent
Yashpal
Coram
K Kannan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CR/1567/2009
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court