Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the impugned orders passed, I do not find any merit in the submissions made. The facts are not so simple as are sought to be projected. Agreement to sell which is sought to be claimed by the petitioner is dated January 27, 1992. The suit for specific performance was filed on May 9, 2008 more than 16 years thereafter. In the suit filed though the valuation of same has been shown as Rs. 1.50 lacs, on which Court fee of Rs. 10,370/- is payable, however, only Rs. 25/- has been affixed as Court fee. There are certain events which took place in the intervening period which are relevant i.e. a suit was filed by respondent No.5 against respondents No.1 to 4 for specific performance of an agreement to sell executed in her favour which was decreed by the trial Court on October 11, 2003. The appeal against the same was dismissed by the learned Additional District Judge, Faridabad on February 2, 2005. The Regular Second Appeal No. 1606 of 2005 was dismissed by this court on September 10, 2007 and even
