Counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the contempt petition with liberty to file an application in the appropriate forum. The Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Contempt petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an appropriate application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.1148 of 2009(O&M) Date of decision: 1.7.2009
Om Parkash
......Petitioner
Versus
Madan Lal
......Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Present: Mr. Ram Bilas Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral)
After arguing the case for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the present contempt petition with liberty to file an appropriate application before the appropriate forum for necessary relief.
With the aforesaid liberty, the contempt petition is dismissed
as withdrawn.
July 1, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE
Om Parkash
Madan Lal
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
