The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of an appeal covered by a prior ruling. With party consent, the matter was heard primarily to confirm coverage by an earlier 1998 decision before dismissal.
The appeal was disposed of relying on the decision in RFA No.2326 of 1998.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CM No.10477-CI of 2008 RFA No.2356 of 2004 (O&M)
-1 -
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CM No.10477-CI of 2008 RFA No.2356 of 2004 (O&M)
Date of Decision : 3.12.2008
Sukhwinder Kaur
..Appellant
Vs.
UT Chandigarh
..Respondent.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: Mr.Sandeep Dhiman, Advocate for the applicant-appellant.
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J.
This is an application under Section 151 CPC with a prayer that appeal be listed for actual date of hearing being covered by the judgment in RFA No.2326 of 1998 titled Som Nath & Others Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh decided on 3.9.2008.
Notice in the application was issued. Sh.Deepak Sharma, Advocate has appeared on behalf of UT Chandigarh. Counsel for the respondent has stated that matter is fully covered by the decision rendered in RFA No.2326 of 1998 titled Som Nath & Others Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh decided on 3.9.2008.
With the consent of both the parties, the main case is being heard.
CM No.10477-CI of 2008 -2 - RFA No.2356 of 2004 (O&M)
RFA No.2356 of 2004
Both the parties are ad idem that the present appeal is covered by the decision of this Court in RFA No.2326 of 1998 titled Som Nath & Others Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh decided on 3.9.2008. Accordingly, the present appeal is also disposed of in view of the decision rendered in RFA No.2326 of 1998 titled Som Nath & Others Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh decided on 3.9.2008 .
3.12.2008 Meenu
(Rakesh Kumar Jain) Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present appeal is covered by the decision in RFA No.2326 of 1998
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Som Nath & Others Vs. Union Territory, ChandigarhRelied on¶17
RFA No.2326 of 1998 titled Som Nath & Others Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh decided on 3.9.2008
Sukhwinder Kaur
UT Chandigarh
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
