The High Court dismissed an application to recall an interim order dismissing an appeal due to non-prosecution as no one appeared for the appellants despite repeated call.
Application for recalling the order dated 12.8.2008 is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.1742 of 2007 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 23.10.2008
Dharampal and others
..Appellants.
Vs. State of Haryana and another
..Respondents.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: None for the applicants-appellants.
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J.
Nobody has put in appearance on behalf of the applicantsappellants to argue the application for recalling of the order dated 12.8.2008 whereby the appeal was dismissed for non prosecution. Since, no one has appeared on behalf of the applicants-appellants in spite of the case having been called twice, the application is also dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Rakesh Kumar Jain) 23.10.2008 Judge Meenu
Dharampal and others
State of Haryana and another
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
