Ram Kanwar v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
A one-line order granting the request to refer parties to a separate detailed order for the disposal of Reference No. 1594 of 1994.
A one-line order granting the request to refer parties to a separate detailed order for the disposal of Reference No. 1594 of 1994.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. No. 1594 of 1994 (O & M)
Union of India
............Appellant
Versus
Amolak Singh and another ..........Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. Brijeshwar Singh Kanwar, Advocate for the UIO.
None for the landowner. Mr. Yatinder Sharma, DAG, Punjab.
RAJESH BINDAL J.
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order
passed today in R.F.A. No.1257 of 1993, titled Union of India Versus
Sawaran Kaur and another.
21.12.2010
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
A.Gupta
Union of India
Amolak Singh
another
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court