The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the appeal referencing detailed reasons recorded in a concurrent appeal (No. 1911 of 1990) involving the same parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh
R. F. A. No. 1580 of 1990
Date of decision : 17.11.2008
Nafe Singh and others ..... Appellants vs Union of India and others .... Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present: Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Advocate for Mr. Rajesh Garg, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.
Rajesh Bindal J.
For the detailed reasons recorded in R. F. A. No. 1911 of 1990 – Sardha Ram and others vs Union of India and others vide separate order of even date, the present appeal is dismissed.
17.11.2008 vs.
( Rajesh Bindal) Judge
Nafe Singh and others
Union of India and others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
