Clause by clause analysis of the judgment text reveals no legal issues, no acts cited, no cases cited, and no substantive reasoning. The petition was simply dismissed as withdrawn. Classification as thin is appropriate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.7847 of 2006 (O & M). Date of decision:-01.5.2008.
Pawan Kumar
...Petitioner.
Versus
Punjab State Agricultural Marketing Board and others ...Respondents.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA
Present:Mr. R.K.Girdhar,Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Akshay Kumar, Advocate.
Mr. S.C.Arora, Advocate for respondent No.4.
ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA J .
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed
to withdraw the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA)
JUDGE
(KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA) 1st May, 2008. JUDGE asija
Pawan Kumar
Punjab State Agricultural Marketing Board
Ashutosh Mohanta
Kanwalsingh Ahluwalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
