Disposed
Satinder Singh v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/13962/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No.13962 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
No.13962 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Civil Writ Petition No.13962 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Civil Writ Petition No.13962 of 2008 Decided on : 17.12.2008
Satinder Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others.
....Respondents.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JORA SINGH.
Present: Mr.Jagat Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Ashish Kapoor, Addl. A.G., Haryana, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr.Dheeraj Chawla, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
judgment ?
M.M.Kumar, J
The petitioner has approached this Court for quashing the impugned notifications dated 08.06.2007 and 27.02.2008 (Annexures P-1 and P-4), issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for brevity 'the Act) whereby the Government has sought to acquire the
Civil Writ Petition No.13962 of 2008 2
land for public purpose namely for extension of Industrial Growth in village Rudh, Chirahara, Banipur, Bawal, Tehsil Bawal, District Rewari.
Notice of motion was issued to the respondents and this Court has stayed dispossession on 31.10.2008, till the next date of hearing. Thereafter, the matter was taken up for hearing on 10.12.2008.
At the hearing today, learned counsel for respondent No.3 has stated that the respondents have considered the question of releasing the land of the writ petitioner from acquisition. He has further stated that the land belonging to the petitioner has been fully released.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforementioned factual position. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed that the writ petition be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous in respect of the land of the petitioner.
In view of the above, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such.
(M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE
December 17, 2008 (JORA SINGH) mamta-II JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Satinder Singh
State of Haryana
M.M. Kumar
Jora Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court