Petition declared infructuous as petitioner No.1 was elected in the subsequent election; petition dismissed. No substantive decision on writ merits.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
C.W.P. No. 12990 of 2008
DATE OF DECISION : 04.08.2008
Narinder Sharma and others
.... PETITIONERS
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. H.S. Sethi, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. A.S. Jattana, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral )
Counsel for the petitioners, on instructions from the petitioners,
states that this petition has become infructuous, as petitioner No.1 has been elected in the election conducted subsequently.
Dismissed as infructuous.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
August 04, 2008 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) ndj JUDGE
Narinder Sharma and others
State of Punjab and others
Satish Kumar Mittal
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
