Petitioners were permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw with liberty to file fresh petition with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
C.W.P. No. 10304 of 2008
DATE OF DECISION : 07.08.2008
Joginder Singh and others
.... PETITIONERS
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. Kulbhushan Soi, Advocate, for the petitioners.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral )
Counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file fresh one with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
August 07, 2008 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) ndj JUDGE
Joginder Singh and others
State of Punjab and others
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
DAYA CHAUDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
