A single judge quashed the FIR and subsequent proceedings under IPC sections 365, 323, and 34, held to be unnecessary as the dispute was settled amicably by parties with support of relations.
FIR dated 19.12.2003 under Sections 365, 323, 34 IPC and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. -M No. 20756 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision : November 11, 2008
Karamjit Singh and others
....Petitioners
versus
State of Punjab and another
....Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pritam Pal
Present: Mr. Jasbir Rattan, Advocate, for the petitioners
Mr. IPS Sidhu, Sr. DAG Punjab
Mr. Vinit Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondent no. 2
Pritam Pal,J. (Oral)
Petitioners have brought this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of F.I.R. No. 128 dated 19.12.2003 under Sections 365, 323, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Division Sherpur District Barnala and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.
This case was registered at the instance of respondent no. 2 Bikramjit Singh complainant who is present in the Court with Sh. Vinit Chaudhary, Advocate. Now the parties have settled the dispute amicably with the intervention of the respectables and common relations. In this regard, compromise deed Annexure P/2 is also placed on the file.
Criminal Misc. -M No. 20 756 of 2008 (O&M)
-2-
In the given facts and circumstances, this Court feels that no useful purpose would be served if the proceedings in the case in hand are allowed to continue. In the result, this petition succeeds and consequently, F.I.R. No. 128 dated 19.12.2003 under Sections 365, 323, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Division Sherpur District Barnala and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby ordered to be quashed.
November 11, 2008 ' dalbir'
( Pritam Pal ) Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR and subsequent proceedings under Sections 365, 323, and 34 of the IPC should be quashed due to amicable settlement between parties.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Karamjit Singh and others
State of Punjab and another
Pritam Pal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
