The respondent-landlord filed a petition for ejectment of the petitioners/tenants on the ground of personal necessity. The shop in dispute was rented out to the petitioners at the monthly rent of Rs. 2,500/-. The eviction of the petitioners from the shop in dispute was sought for bonafide necessity of sons of the respondent, who wanted to start business of electric and electronics goods and repair thereof in the said shop. There was no other shop in possession of the respondent in which such a business could be started. One of the sons of the respondent was holding a National Trade Certificate from the Department of Industry Training and Vocational Education, Haryana whereas another one was a graduate. At the time of filing of the petition, both the sons were unemployed and it was only during the pendency of the petition that one of the son has got employment as a teacher. In the another shop, which was owned by respondent, he was carrying on his own business and demised premises was required by him for bonafide need of his sons, who infact were already carrying on the business in a Chaubara of a shop. The only plea raised by the petitioners was that during the pendency of the petition one of the son had got employment, so need of landlord was not subsisting. Such a plea, in my view, has rightly
