This is a non-speaking order dismissing a writ petition for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear at multiple hearing dates.
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No. 8009 of 2004
Date of decision: November 13, 2006
Kundan Singh
.........Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and Ors.
...........Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE NIRMAL YADAV
Present: None for the petitioner
Mr. C.M. Munjal, Sr. Addl. A.G. Pb. for the State
ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J (Oral)
No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner today.
A perusal of the case file shows that none had also appeared on the behalf of the petitioner, on 05.08.2004, 27.05.2005, 27.09.2005, 10.02.2006 and 21.07.2006.
From the above, it is clear that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the writ petition diligently.
Accordingly, we dismiss the present writ petition for want of prosecution.
( ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA) JUDGE
( NIRMAL YADAV) JUDGE
November 13, 2006 mohan
Kundan Singh
State of Punjab
ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA
NIRMAL YADAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
