Nirmla v. State of Haryana and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking the eviction of persons occupying a street and pond. It held that eviction is a matter for a competent civil court and noted that removal of illegal possession from the street had already occurred.
What did the court decide?
The prayer for issuance of a writ directing respondents to vacate the land was dismissed. The plea for eviction was discouraged as it lies in the domain of a competent court.