Petitioner sought writ to quash transfer orders and seek posting in alternative schools. High Court directed respondents to consider petitioner's representation and decide expeditiously within two months.
Directions to take cognizance of petitioner's representation and decide within two months with a speaking order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
C.W.P. No. 17283 of 2006
Date of Decision: 2.11.2006
Raj Kumari
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
PRESENT: Mr. H.P.S. Bhinder, Advocate, for the petitioner.
JUDGMENT
M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral)
This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing order dated 12.6.2006 (P-4) whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Government High School, Jalalana, District Sirsa to Government Sr. Secondary School, Jodhkan, District Sirsa. Challenge to the transfer order of respondent No. 4, dated 2.7.2006(P-5) has also been made. A further prayer has been made directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for his posting at Government High School, Jalalana and to cancel the transfer order of respondent No. 4 or in the alternative to post the petitioner at Government Senior
C.W.P. No. 17282 of 2006
2
Secondary School, Pipli or Government High School, Mangiana or Government High School, Panniwala Ruldu, District Sirsa.
For the relief claimed in the instant petition, the petitioner has already sent a representation, dated 25.9.2006 (P-6) to the respondents.
Without going into the merits of the case, we deem it just and appropriate to direct the respondents to take cognizance of the representation dated 25.9.2006 (P-6) sent by the petitioner and decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is presented to them. The petitioner shall be at liberty to file a supplementary representation within one week from today under Registered A.D. cover. It shall be appreciated if a speaking order is passed.
Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.
(M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE
(M.M.S. BEDI)
November 2, 2006 JUDGE
Pkapoor
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents should consider the petitioner's representation regarding posting and transfer orders expeditiously.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raj Kumari
State of Haryana
M.M. Kumar
M.M.S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
