Briefly stated the facts are that Kulwant Kaur, respondent No.1 filed a suit for recovery of Rs. two lacs on account of damages for the accidental death of her husband Satnam Singh that took place on 19.7.1984. Satnam Singh was employed as Driver by Joginder Singh. The suit was decreed by Subordinate Judge Ist Class, Nawanshahar on 17.3.1990 for the recovery of Rs. 1,92,000/with costs against Jai Narain and Joginder Singh only. Kulwant Kaur decree-holder filed execution application for execution of the said decree in which judgment debtor Jai Narain and the legal representatives of another judgment debtor Joginder Singh took an objection that they had already paid a sum of Rs. 1,50,000/- to the decree holder and therefore, the execution petition may be dismissed as satisfied. It was further alleged that a sum of Rs. 20,000/- was also received by Kulwant Kaur vide receipt dated 13.11.1990 and therefore a total sum of Rs. 1,70,000/- was paid which was agreed to be paid between the parties on the basis of a compromise arrived at. The facts set out in the objections were denied by the decree holder and this controversy led to framing of the following issues:
