High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of a petition filed by Punjab State Electricity Board as having been rendered infructuous based on counsel's statement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
C.R. No. 1538 of 1992 Date of decision September 6, 2006
Punjab State Electricity Board, Patiala and others
.......Petitioners
Versus
Raj Kumar and others
........Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
Present:None for the petitioner. Sh. Rajesh Garg, Advocate for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present
petition has been rendered infructuous and be disposed of accordingly.
In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for
the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
(VINEY MITTAL) JUDGE
September 6, 2006 archana
Punjab State Electricity Board, Patiala and others
Raj Kumar and others
VINEY MITTAL
archana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
