Kedar Paswan v. Fushan Paswan
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal No.185 of 1991, Patna High Court, dismissed for default under Order XLI Rule 17 Code of Civil Procedure; non-prosecution; appellants absent on 18.09.2025, 23.09.2025, 10.11.2025 and 15.12.2025; nobody appeared on repeated calls on 29-01-2026; single judge Ramesh Chand Malviya; appellants Kedar Paswan and others (Defendant 1st Party) versus respondents Fushan Paswan and others (Plaintiff 1st Party / Defendant 2nd Party), all of Village Pastapar, P.S. and Anchal Mahishi, District Saharsa; no advocates appearing; no merits decided; no costs or amounts awarded.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal is dismissed for default under Order XLI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as the appellants were absent on the last four dates and nobody appeared on repeated calls to press the appeal. ¶26