Allowed¶32

Ram Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 May 2026MJC/957/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, MJC No. 957 of 2026 in CWJC No. 3832 of 2014, decided 08-05-2026 by Rajiv Roy, J. Restoration application by Ram Kumar Singh (village Purhara, Haspura, Aurangabad) for recall of dismissal-for-default of his writ petition against the State of Bihar, Superintendent of Police/Circle Officer/Sub-Inspector Haspura and private residents of village Purhara; dismissal was for non-compliance of order dated 20.11.2025; MJC allowed subject to Rs. 500/- payment to Patna High Court Legal Services Committee and writ case restored to original file. Keywords: restoration, dismissal for default, non-compliance, MJC, CWJC, legal services committee costs.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of CWJC No. 3832 of 2014 to its original file, subject to payment of Rs.500/- to Patna High Court Legal Services Committee. ¶32

Ram Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.957 of 2026 In

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3832 of 2014

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ram Kumar Singh son of Late Hari Narayan Singh, Resident of village Purhara, P.S Haspuara, District Aurangabad.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Aurangabad. 3. The Circle Officer Haspura, Aurangabad. 4. The Sub Inspector of Police, Haspura, Aurangabad. 5. Md. Reyaz Ansari, S/o Md Mustakim Ansari, R/o village Purhara, P.O purhara, P.S Haspura, Block Haspura, District Aurangabad.

¶8

1. Jitendra Kumar, S/o Ramayodhya Pandit, R/O village Purhara Po purhara, Block Haspura, PS haspura District Aurangabad.

¶9

1. Sanjay Kumar, s/o Ramsubhag yadav, R/o village Purhara P.O purhara Block haspura, P.S Haspura District Aurangabad.

¶10

1. Lalan Yadav, S/o Dhramdev yadav, R/O village Purhara P.O purahara P.S Haspura Block Haspura District Aurangabad.

¶11

1. Amrendra Kumar, s/o Late Ishwar dyal Yadav, R/o village Purhara P.O Purhara Block Haspura P.S Haspura District Aurangabad.

¶12

1. Anisha Khatun, w/o villalge Purhara P.O Purhara Block Haspura P.S haspura District Aurangabad.

¶13

1. Dil Bahadur Paswan, s/o Kuldip Paswan, R/o village Purhara P.O Purhara Block Haspura P.S Haspura, District Aurangabad.

¶14

1. Jubaida Khatun, S/o village purhara P.O Purhara, Block Haspura P.S Haspura District Aurangabad.

¶15

1. Ram Sihasan Yadav, s./o Ram Bharat yadav, R/o village Purhara P.O Purhara Block Haspura, P.S Haspura District Aurangabad.

¶16

1. Rambhu Kunwar, s/o Late Mohan Bhagat, R/o village Purhara P.O Purhara P.S Haspura, Block Haspura District Aurangabad.

¶17

1. Ayub Ansari, S/o Doman Ansari, R/o village Purhara P.O Purhara P.S Haspura Block Haspura District Aurangabad

¶18

1. Chandravati, w/o Late Saday Yadav, R/o village Purhara P.O Purhara P.S Haspura Block Haspura District Aurangabad.

¶19

1. Mahendra Singh, s/o Ram pati singh, R/o village Purhara P.O Purhara P.S Haspura Block Haspura District Aurangabad.

¶20

Pappukant Kumar, s/o Late Thakur dyal Yadav, R/o villalge Purhara P.O Purhara, Block Haspura P.S Haspura District Aurangabad.

¶21

Rajindra yadav, s/o Ramashish yadav, R/o village Purhara P.O Purhara, Block Haspura P.s Haspura District Aurangabad.

¶22

Patna High Court MJC No.957 of 2026(3) dt.08-05-2026 2/2

¶23

Sajan Yadav, s/o Late Dev muni Yadav, R/o village purhara P.O Purhara Block Haspura P.S haspra District Aurangabad.

¶24

Shiv vachan Yadav, s/o Baudh Yadav, R/o village Purhara P.s Haspura P.O Purhara Block Haspura District Aurangabad.

¶25

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶26

======================================================

¶27

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bindeshwar Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Additional Advocate General 3 ======================================================

¶28

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶29

3 08-05-2026 Heard the parties.

¶30

The present petition has been preferred for restoration of CWJC No. 3832 of 2014 to its original file which was dismissed for default on 02.02.2026 due to non-compliance of the order dated 20.11.2025.

¶31

For the reasons assigned in paragraph no.4 of the petition, MJC No. 957 of 2026 is allowed subject to payment of Rs.500/- to Patna High Court Legal Services Committee.

¶32

Accordingly, CWJC No. 3832 of 2014 is restored to its original file.

¶33

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶34

vinayak/-

¶35

Ram Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Radheshyam Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Seema Kumari (Advocate) Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Sachiwalay

Aashif Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Mahendra Kumar Verma Vs The State of Bihar through Mr. Dipak Kumar Singh The Additional Chief Secretary

Mosafir Pal Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms