Dismissed¶¶22

Kameshwar Singh v. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department

Patna HC15 May 2026MJC/625/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; MJC No.625 of 2026; arising from CWJC No.9915 of 2025; contempt/miscellaneous jurisdiction; compliance with writ Court order; reasoned speaking order dated 28.04.2026; Memo No. 1094; Annexure-R/D; application dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to challenge compliance order; Panchayati Raj Department; Gopalganj; Barauli Block/Ward No. 3; petitioner Kameshwar Singh; Justice Alok Kumar Sinha; decision date 15-05-2026.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of the contempt application as withdrawn, with liberty to challenge the order dated 28.04.2026 vide Memo No. 1094 (Annexure-R/D). ¶¶22

Kameshwar Singh Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.625 of 2026

¶2

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9915 of 2025

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Kameshwar Singh Son of Late Bhatki Singh, Resident of Village- Maranpur, P.O.- Nawada, P.S.- Barauli, Anchal- Block- Barauli, District- Gopalganj.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department Government of Bihar, Patna, Bihar Namely Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh.

¶9

The District Magistrate, Gopalganj Namely Mr. Pawan Kumar Sinha.

¶10

The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Gopalganj Namely Mr. Dharmendra Kumar.

¶11

The Block Development Officer, Barauli, District- Gopalganj Namely Mr. Mukesh Kumar.

¶12

The Block Panchayati Raj Officer, Barauli, District- Gopalganj Namely mr. Suchindra Ram.

¶13

The Ward Member, Ward No. 3, Barauli, District- Gopalganj Namely Smt. Babita Devi.

¶14

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raju Prasad, Adv Mr. Devendra Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Shally Kumari, AC to SC -24 ======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶17

3 15-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶18

counsel for the opposite party-State.

¶19

Learned counsel for the opposite party-State submits that in compliance of the order passed by the writ Court, a detailed reasoned and speaking order has been passed on 28.04.2026 vide Memo No. 1094, which has been brought on record by way of Annexure-R/D to the show cause.

¶20

Patna High Court MJC No.625 of 2026(3) dt.15-05-2026 2/2

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner is aggrieved by the said order dated 28.04.2026. He, therefore, submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this contempt application with liberty to challenge the order dated 28.04.2026 vide Memo No. 1094 (Annexure-R/D).

¶22

As prayed for, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.

¶23

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)

¶24

kiran/-

¶25

Kameshwar Singh v. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kameshwar Singh v. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sweta Kumari Vs The Registrar, Aryabhatta Knowledge University

Nishat Haider, Vs The State of Bihar

Anmol Ratan Vs The Central Board of Secondary Education

Rameshwar Kumar @ Ramishwar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Ranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Noorul Islam @ Md. Noorul Islam Vs The State of Bihar